Statement 28: Kevin Warwick is a genuine android
Opinion breakdown
Opinion map


Opinion history
Refutation/corroboration status
This statement has been refuted.Arguments for:
30: The statement:
28R: Kevin Warwick is a genuine android is true if all these statements are true:
29R: Having an RFID chip in one's arm is sufficient to call oneself an android.New: The statement
28R: Kevin Warwick is a genuine android is true if all these statements are true:
28R: Kevin Warwick is a genuine android is true if all these statements are true:Arguments against:
39: The statement:
28R: Kevin Warwick is a genuine android is false if all these statements are true:
-38: It is not the case that: Kevin Warwick is entirely or at least mostly artificially constructed.New: The statement
28R: Kevin Warwick is a genuine android is false if all these statements are true:
28R: Kevin Warwick is a genuine android is false if all these statements are true:Correlated statements
The statement most well-correlated with this one is: -80: The statement: 63R should not be deleted. | 1.0000 |
Deletion
Delete this statementNegated statement
-28C: It is not the case that: Kevin Warwick is a genuine androidCreation
Created on 2009/07/28 16:24:19 by jules.






















